The Data Think Tank provides the opportunity for key decision makers the opportunity to discuss the data needed that will justify change. This process also gives council members to think creatively about how data can be used to springboard into new ways of approacing the Priority Setting and Resource Allocation process that will support People Living with HIV (PLHIV) in the Denver metro area. The following data requests and responses are intended to strengthen future Planning Council research, support informed decision-making, and promote an intentional voting process. A list of recommendations can be found at the bottom of the page. All submitted data and information requests are posted here for transparency, collaboration, and future reference. Members are encouraged to review existing requests and use them as a foundation for developing additional inquiries. The information generated through this process may help identify trends, clarify community needs, support Planning Council discussions, and inform formal motions. Recommendations and motions should be supported by credible, citable data. Add a Title Grievance data Data regarding grievences submitted by people accessing Ryan White services It may be helpful to have general information re: grievences submitted in the last year. This may allow the planning council to note repeated complaints or difficulties that have occured regarding accessing and receiving Ryan White funded services. This feedback may provide helpful information that could lead to adjusting funded categories and priorities. Grievance data and trends have been provided to the PC by the recipient ever 4 months. Date Submitted: 2 de julio de 2026 Requested by: Becca Requested Due Date: Add a Title Medicaid Cut Impacts (because of BBB) Some data presented (specific to the TGA) that forecasts what we can expect and cuts continue in health care and medicaid/medicare/disability related to the "Big Beautiful Bill" (all categories impacted, RW and not- including SDAP) Ask Maria to present on medicaid impacts during the Data Explorations. They will provide as much up to date information that the CDPHE team can find. Maria and Jeremy created slides and presented current information on the impacts of the Medicaid changes. Date Submitted: 25 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Kari P Requested Due Date: 24 de julio de 2026 Add a Title Case Management Continuum Data In addition to previous data question....how has implementing the acuity tool impacted efficiency of the CM continuum? The HIV Care Continuum data provided is helpful regarding HIV status, but can be more detailed to support PSRA decision-making. Future data should stratify outcomes by key demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic factors, including age, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, location, income/poverty, housing, and insurance status, to better identify disparities and gaps in care. (Data should be detailed without revealing potential identification risk). Date Submitted: 25 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Kari P Requested Due Date: 21 de julio de 2026 Add a Title Case Management Continuum Data We have been "evaluating' the "new" CM Contimuum for a few years now. It would be very helpful to have a deeper dive into the effectiveness of the continuum and of each category overall. Data and commentary related to this would be helpful. As previously stated: The HIV Care Continuum data provided is helpful regarding HIV status, but can be more detailed to support PSRA decision-making. See response above. Date Submitted: 25 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Kari P Requested Due Date: 21 de julio de 2026 Add a Title Data Hub Update The Data hub has been very helpful in looking at utlization data, funding and allocation history, additional funding sources supporting the categories, number of funded providers, Barriers and Challenges and the DHR commentary. All of those data points have been very helpful in guiding DHRPC discussions, especially for Resource Allocations. Please make sure the HUB is continued. Updated service categories and PC dashboard. Dashboard should contain additional information on utilization and interactive Denver TGA Continuum graphs. Date Submitted: 25 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Kari P Requested Due Date: 21 de julio de 2026 Add a Title Service Utilization Data We need to see service utlization data that can show trends for the past few years and utilization for the past fiscal year. Utilization shows the services actually being used, not just who is eligible. That helps surface gaps and spot disparities, so priorities and allocations match actual community need, not assumptions. This information should shared with the PC throughout the year. Date Submitted: 25 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Kari P Requested Due Date: 17 de julio de 2026 Add a Title Yearly Resource Allocation Decisions Please provide a couple slides or spreadsheet that reflects the funding percentages from year to year. This information will be useful to examine trends. Link to previous PSRA Certificates: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/135Um2FjGWx8OiwPNkOmixHK1zkNojGL9 Date Submitted: 23 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Teddy Dale Requested Due Date: 30 de julio de 2026 Add a Title Resource Allocations for the Denver TGA that are pre-medicaid? Please provide a previous allocation percentages that reflect what things looked like before Colorado became a Medicaid state. Pre-medicaid allocations would give PC members the opportunity to see possible shifts in Priorities and Allocations. It would be great if there was some historical knowledge that justified those past decisions. This will be helpful for future discussions. Date Submitted: 23 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Teddy Dale Requested Due Date: 24 de julio de 2026 Add a Title More on the Care Continuum We have more information on the Care Continuum? It would be nice if there could be a walk through of what it is. Presentation on the Gardner Cascade and eplanation of the Care Continuum presented at the July general PC meeting by Dr. Ed Gardner. Future continuums need to be provided that reflect demographic, area, etc. See the response above regaarding " Date Submitted: 23 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Teddy Dale Requested Due Date: 23 de junio de 2027 Add a Title Care Continuum for the Denver TGA Please provide a Care Continuum for the Denver TGA. It would be helpful if the care continuum could focus by race and gender. It would be super helpful if there was a care continuum for individuals that engage in Case Management services, and other service categories. (OAH, Mental Health/Substance Misuse, etc) Having historical context simular to he continuums presented by FastTrack Cities, or as far back that can be found. Action Item: Detailed contiuums would be useful and a good use of an online dashboard. This can be provided at Data Explorations that are dispersced throught the year (every 4 months). Date Submitted: 9 de junio de 2026 Requested by: Philip Requested Due Date: 22 de julio de 2026

The Denver HIV Resources Planning Council guides how Ryan White Part A funds are used for HIV care in Denver. With at least one-third People Living with HIV, the Council reviews data, sets service priorities, and makes funding decisions that shape medical care, support services, and long-term planning. This site offers data, videos, workshops, and ways to join and strengthen HIV care in our community. PAGES & LINKS HOW TO JOIN PRIORITY SETTING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS CALENDAR COLORADO HIV STRATEGY CONTACTS THE COUNCIL DATA HUB COMMITTEES & DOCUMENTS VIDEO WORKSHOP DO YOU ACCESS SERVICES AND HAVE CONCERNS OR FEEDBACK? GRIEVANCES • FEEDBACK • COMMENTS • CONCERNS CLICK HERE LINKS RELATED TO PRIORITY SETTING AND RESOURCE ALLOATION (PSRA) Ryan White Part A Planning Councils guide how federal HIV care funds are used locally. They include the essential participation from People Living with HIV (PLHIV), review data and community input, set service priorities, decide how funds are distributed, and develop long-term plans for a coordinated system of care. While the grantee manages daily operations, the Council ensures funding decisions remain informed and responsive to community needs. Get to Know Us Ryan White HIV Planning Councils are unique. No other federal health or human services program has a legislatively required planning body that is the decision maker about how funds will be used, has such defined membership composition, and requires such a high level of client participation (at least 33 percent). To learn more about the roles and responsibilities of the Planning Council, please view the PC Primer here . © 2026 Denver HIV Resources Planning Council

The Data Think Tank provides the opportunity for key decision makers the opportunity to discuss the data needed that will justify change. This process also gives council members to think creatively about how data can be used to springboard into new ways of approacing the Priority Setting and Resource Allocation process that will support People Living with HIV (PLHIV) in the Denver metro area. All submitted data and information requests are posted here for transparency, collaboration, and future reference. Members are encouraged to review existing requests and use them as a foundation for developing additional inquiries. The information generated through this process may help identify trends, clarify community needs, support Planning Council discussions, and inform formal motions. Recommendations and motions should be supported by credible, citable data. Posted Requests & Questions Posted Requests & Questions Posted Requests & Questions Posted Requests & Questions SUPPORTING CHANGE THROUGH INTENTIONAL DATA EXPLORATION Add a Title Grievance data Data regarding grievences submitted by people accessing Ryan White services It may be helpful to have general information re: grievences submitted in the last year. This may allow the planning council to note repeated complaints or difficulties that have occured regarding accessing and receiving Ryan White funded services. This feedback may provide helpful information that could lead to adjusting funded categories and priorities. 2 de julio de 2026 Becca Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Medicaid Cut Impacts (because of BBB) Some data presented (specific to the TGA) that forecasts what we can expect and cuts continue in health care and medicaid/medicare/disability related to the "Big Beautiful Bill" (all categories impacted, RW and not- including SDAP) Ask Maria to present on medicaid impacts during the Data Explorations. They will provide as much up to date information that the CDPHE team can find. 25 de junio de 2026 Kari P Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Case Management Continuum Data In addition to previous data question....how has implementing the acuity tool impacted efficiency of the CM continuum? The HIV Care Continuum data provided is helpful regarding HIV status, but can be more detailed to support PSRA decision-making. 25 de junio de 2026 Kari P Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Case Management Continuum Data We have been "evaluating' the "new" CM Contimuum for a few years now. It would be very helpful to have a deeper dive into the effectiveness of the continuum and of each category overall. Data and commentary related to this would be helpful. As previously stated: The HIV Care Continuum data provided is helpful regarding HIV status, but can be more detailed to support PSRA decision-making. 25 de junio de 2026 Kari P Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Data Hub Update The Data hub has been very helpful in looking at utlization data, funding and allocation history, additional funding sources supporting the categories, number of funded providers, Barriers and Challenges and the DHR commentary. All of those data points have been very helpful in guiding DHRPC discussions, especially for Resource Allocations. Please make sure the HUB is continued. 25 de junio de 2026 Kari P Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Service Utilization Data We need to see service utlization data that can show trends for the past few years and utilization for the past fiscal year. 25 de junio de 2026 Kari P Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Yearly Resource Allocation Decisions Please provide a couple slides or spreadsheet that reflects the funding percentages from year to year. This information will be useful to examine trends. 23 de junio de 2026 Teddy Dale Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Resource Allocations for the Denver TGA that are pre-medicaid? Please provide a previous allocation percentages that reflect what things looked like before Colorado became a Medicaid state. Pre-medicaid allocations would give PC members the opportunity to see possible shifts in Priorities and Allocations. It would be great if there was some historical knowledge that justified those past decisions. 23 de junio de 2026 Teddy Dale Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title More on the Care Continuum We have more information on the Care Continuum? It would be nice if there could be a walk through of what it is. Presentation on the Gardner Cascade and eplanation of the Care Continuum presented at the July general PC meeting by Dr. Ed Gardner. Future continuums need to be provided that reflect demographic, area, etc. 23 de junio de 2026 Teddy Dale Date Submitted: Submitted by: Add a Title Care Continuum for the Denver TGA Please provide a Care Continuum for the Denver TGA. It would be helpful if the care continuum could focus by race and gender. It would be super helpful if there was a care continuum for individuals that engage in Case Management services, and other service categories. (OAH, Mental Health/Substance Misuse, etc) Having historical context simular to he continuums presented by FastTrack Cities, or as far back that can be found. 9 de junio de 2026 Philip Date Submitted: Submitted by: 2 de julio de 2026

CMS TEST PAGE DO NOT USE CMS TEST PAGE DO NOT USE CMS TEST PAGE DO NOT USE CMS TEST PAGE DO NOT USE Data Request Title Example: "Women living with HIV Data" or "Part A Housing Impact Request" Provide a short description of the request. Data Request Summary In a few sentences provide a the reason for this request. Normal Text Title Subtitle Normal Text Provide more information about the request. This may include possible questions or an idea of how these data will support PSRA outcomes. Data Request Details Give details of this request. Normal Text Title Subtitle Normal Text Need Data Resuts By Date of Reqest Requested By Submit

Each year, the Denver HIV Resources Planning Council (DHRPC) carefully reviews all Ryan White Part A service categories to determine how funding should be distributed. This annual Resource Allocation process is rooted in data and guided by the lived experiences of People Living with HIV (PLHIV). The Resource Allocation process begins with a review of relevant data to evaluate each service category. The Planning Council applies a consistent set of evaluation components to guide decision-making. These include: Importance of the service to People Living with HIV (PLHIV) Impact on viral suppression and the HIV Care Continuum Utilization and demand for the service Provision availability from other funding sources Cost-effectiveness of delivering the service Additional data requests may be submitted to Planning Council leadership Council staff, or directly through this website. After evaluations, the Council sets funding percentages and prepares a Contingency Allocation Plan in case awards or other federal funding streams shift. Plans may be enacted immediately if changes are known or delayed until data is confirmed. Resource Allocation rules safeguard essential services by redirecting funds when major shifts occur. Because Ryan White is the payor of last resort, funds are used only when no other options are available. Every decision reflects a commitment to fiscal responsibility and health outcomes that matter. PRIORITY SETTING FY25 PRIORITY SETTING RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS SERVICE CATEGORIES What is Priority Setting? Resource Allocation is one of the most critical responsibilities of the Planning Council. It is a deliberate, data-driven process that determines how limited Ryan White Part A funds are distributed across eligible services in the Denver TGA. This isn’t just budgeting—it’s strategic triage. With funding levels vulnerable to shifts and economic constraints, the Planning Council must ensure every dollar maximizes health outcomes and meets the core medical and support service needs of people living with HIV. In this environment, Resource Allocation requires fiscal discipline, thoughtful analysis, and commitment to PLHIV. The process involves reviewing utilization trends, service performance, and cost-effectiveness to develop a funding strategy that is both responsive and resilient—even in the face of uncertainty. The decisions made during our Resource Allocations meeting will have a direct impact on access, care, and the future of HIV services in our region. It’s important to note: Not all service categories will receive funding. Contingency Allocations will be established in case the FY2026 grant award is less than expected. Allocation rules may be established to fund or not fund categories at certain percentages when the grant award less a certain percent. Step 1 : Evaluation of the Part A Service Categories Evaluation components determine where service categories will be grouped and includes: what is the service's importance (to PLHIV), impact (on viral suppression and HIV Care Continuum), utilization and demand , provision availability (of funding source), and cost value obtained through service delivery. Here is a closer look at the components used to evaluate the service categories: 1. The Importance to PLHIV PLHIV-Centered Priority Setting By recognizing PLHIV as active participants—not just recipients—in the planning and implementation of HIV care, the Planning Council strives to strengthen a culturally responsive system at the heart of the Ryan White Part A program. Examples of why this matters: The needs of the individual changes throughout their lifetime. Above all else, a PLHIV experiencing homelessness may prioritize Housing Support Services above or Emergency Financial Assistance over other services which are critical for stabilizing their care and access to services. In the Denver TGA, Psychosocial Support Services have historically ranked high because social connection creates space for shared knowledge, emotional support, and empowerment. 2. Impact Service categories that support medication access, adherence, and clinical engagement are central to improving health outcomes for PLHIV and achieving viral suppression. The Planning Council considers how the delivery of services impacts the HIV Care Continuum when setting priorities. Examples: Access to HIV medication is essential for viral suppression and long-term health. ADAP plays a crucial role in ensuring affordability and continuity of treatment. PLHIV who use substances may face challenges with medication adherence. Access to substance use treatment and harm reduction strategies supports care retention and viral load management. Regular visits with HIV care providers help monitor health, adjust treatment as needed, and reinforce adherence-making Outpatient Ambulatory Health a key pillar in achieving viral suppression. 3. Utilization and Demand of Use The Planning Council considers how a service category is being used in the Denver TGA, and the demand for what it provides. Utilization of services informs how well a category is funded. Service Categories that are underspent may not be utilized as much as those with consistent overspending, indicating high demand. Examples: Oral health has a significant impact on overall health and the ability of PLHIV to thrive and it is consistently overspent and in high demand. Medical Nutrition Therapy can greatly benefit PLHIV—especially those managing other conditions like diabetes or gastrointestinal issues and utilization in the Denver TGA has historically been low. This may be due to a limited number of trained providers, lack of patient awareness, or a perception that nutrition support is less urgent than other clinical needs. Low demand also reflects broader changes in the health trajectory of PLHIV. As medical advancements have improved overall wellness, many will no longer face the same nutritional challenges common in the early days of the epidemic. Despite its lower utilization, MNT remains essential for certain populations and warrants consideration based on targeted demand. It should also be noted that, while MNT is a core medical service, it is currently supported through other funding sources. 4. Provision Availability by Payor Source Ryan White Part A is the payor of last resort—meaning it only covers services when no other funding source is available. Priority Setting takes into account whether a service is already paid for by another payor, such as Medicaid, private insurance, or other public programs. This ensures Ryan White Part A funds are used efficiently and directed toward services that cannot be covered elsewhere. Examples: Initial Intake Appointment: For someone newly diagnosed who does not yet have insurance coverage, Ryan White Part A may fund the initial medical visit to ensure immediate linkage to care. Medical Transportation Services (MTS): If Medicaid or other public transportation benefits are not available or applicable, Ryan White Part A may step in to cover transportation costs for medical appointments. However, if another payor is available, that source must be used first. 5. Cost and Value of the Provided Service When setting priorities, the Planning Council considers whether the cost of providing a service is reasonable and sustainable within the available Ryan White Part A budget. Even if a service is in high demand, it must be weighed against how far the funds can stretch and the overall value it brings to PLHIV in the Denver TGA. Cost-effectiveness is a key factor—services that provide broad, sustained impact for a reasonable cost may be ranked higher than more expensive services that serve fewer people or duplicate efforts already funded elsewhere. Examples: Residential Substance Use Services: While important, these services come with a high per-person cost. In the Denver TGA, funding this category through Ryan White Part A would quickly lead to overspending, limiting available dollars for other high-impact services. Housing Services: The need for housing support is critical, but the scale of investment required often exceeds what Ryan White Part A can reasonably provide. As a result, funding housing at a meaningful level would compromise the program’s ability to maintain essential core medical services. Next Step: Council Discussion Discuss, Propose, Finalize, Vote Following a thorough evaluation, the Planning Council determines funding percentages for each service category. These decisions are grounded in data trends and priorities identified through the Priority Setting process. The goal is to ensure resources are directed where they will have the greatest impact. Given the unpredictability of annual grant awards, the Council also prepares a contingency allocation plan—starting with an 80% funding scenario and adaptable down to 60% if necessary. Additional contingencies may be developed, and the Council stands ready to make timely reallocations if funding conditions shift mid-year. This proactive approach protects service continuity and reinforces the DHRPC’s responsibility as stewards of public health funding. The Promise of Resource Allocation Resource Allocation is a council responsibility that is taken very seriously. It is more than assigning funds—it’s a pledge to use every dollar with purpose and accountability. With limited resources and great needs, the process ensures care is guided by evidence and foresight, protecting access, strengthening outcomes, and honoring the trust placed in us. DHRPC Workshop Videos For more visit the DHRPC Video Workshop

Todos merecen ser tratados con dignidad y satisfacer sus necesidades. Háganos saber en qué nos quedamos cortos para mejorar el sistema. Si presenta una queja, la información que proporcione ayudará a mejorar los servicios para las personas que viven con VIH en el área de Denver y no afectará negativamente los servicios que recibe. Valoramos todos sus comentarios y las quejas se toman en serio. Su voz importa mientras continuamos trabajando para mejorar los servicios para las personas que viven con VIH. Gracias. CONTINUAR SALIDA

PRIORITY SETTING This approach honors the legacy of The Denver Principles , which call for the meaningful involvement of PLHIV in every aspect of their care and advocacy. By prioritizing services with community input, we uphold the right of PLHIV to be not just recipients of care—but leaders in shaping it. The Denver Principles Through the process of Priority Setting, the Planning Council identifies which services are most vital to improving the lives of People Living with HIV (PLHIV). While the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program funds services that support better health outcomes, Priority Setting ensures that decisions are not made in a vacuum—but with the lived experiences of PLHIV at the forefront. The Planning Council values the lived experiences of People Living with HIV as it transforms the traditional role of “patient” into “participant”. This places the voices of those most impacted by HIV at the center of the decision-making process. When PLHIV are heard, priorities evolve to reflect real needs including those that may be unique or less commonly shared. This process also promotes a value-based, participant-led model to ensure that the Ryan White system stays relevant and grounded in real-life experience. The ultimate goal of Priority Setting is to ensure that each decision the Planning Council makes goes beyond numbers —centering the lives, voices, and well-being of people living with HIV. PRIORITY SETTING FY25 PRIORITY SETTING RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS SERVICE CATEGORIES Helpful background information... RYAN WHITE PART A - SERVICE CATEGORIES Review: Core and Support Service Categories A service category is a provision that is designed to serve specific needs for people living with HIV (PLHIV). Ryan White Part A- Service Categories are divided into two types: The Core Medical Service Categories Core Medical Services relate directly to the provision of HIV care and treatment Core Medical Service Categories: - AIDS Pharmaceutical Assistance (ADAP/ SDAP) - Early Intervention Services - Health Insurance Premium/ Cost Sharing Assistance - Home and Community-Based Health Services - Home Health Care - Hospice - Medical Case Management, including Treatment Adherence Services - Medical Nutrition Therapy - Mental Health Services - Oral Health Care - Outpatient/Ambulatory Health Services - Substance Abuse Outpatient Care Note: At least 75% of funded categories should be core service categories. If support services used exceed 25% of funding Denver HIV Resources (DHR) must apply for a waiver. The Support Service Categories Support Services help PLHIV to stay in care and support better medical outcomes Support Service Categories: - Child Care Services - Emergency Financial Assistance - Food Bank/Home Delivered Meals - Health Education/Risk Reduction - Housing - Legal Services - Linguistic Services - Medical Transportation - Non-Medical Case Management Services - Other Professional Services - Outreach Services - Permanency Planning - Psychosocial Support Services - Referral for Health Care and Support Services - Rehabilitation Services - Respite Care - Substance Abuse Services (residential) More information on service categories, including definitions and the allowable use of funds can be found in Policy Clarification Notice (PCN) #16-02 CLICK HERE FOR THE FY2025 PRIORTY SETTING FOR PART A PRIORITY SETTING FY25 PRIORITY SETTING RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS SERVICE CATEGORIES What is Priority Setting? Priority Setting is the process of ranking Ryan White Part A service categories from highest to lowest priority based on the needs of PLHIV in the Denver Transitional Grant Area (TGA). This ranking helps determine which services are most needed and only those that are prioritized can receive a funding allocation. This process is especially important when funding shifts occur (known as reallocations) or when unforeseen circumstances require contingency funding. For example, if changes in federal funding impact Medicaid, the Planning Council may need to adjust allocations to address the resulting service gaps. Priority Setting is conducted annually. All 24 Ryan White Part A service categories are reviewed and the Planning Council is responsible for ranking them in order of importance. It’s important to note: Not all service categories will receive funding. The ranking order reflects need and not cost because some services may be more expensive to implement than others and may be covered by other funding sources. Core Medical and Support Services can be ranked at any level depending on Planning Council consensus. To be most effective, Priority Setting should be completed well in advance of the Resource Allocation process. Early completion ensures that Planning Council members are familiar with priority areas, allows time for targeted data requests and listening sessions, and provides timely guidance to the office of Denver HIV Resources (DHR). THE HEART BEAT OF LIVED HIV EXPERIENCE Elevating What PLHIV Say Matters Most By recognizing PLHIV as active participants—not just recipients—in the planning and implementation of HIV care, the Planning Council strives to strengthen a culturally responsive system at the heart of the Ryan White Part A program. Why this matters... EXAMPLE 1 The needs of the individual changes throughout their lifetime. Above all, PLHIV experiencing homelessness may prioritize Housing Support Services and Emergency Financial Assistance as services that are critical for stabilizing their daily life, over other service categories. EXAMPLE 2 In the Denver TGA, Psychosocial Support Services have historically ranked high because social connection creates space for shared knowledge, emotional support and empowerment. This has been reiterated at all listening sessions by PLHIV. People find security, comfort and helpful tips from their peers. EXAMPLE 3 While Food Bank/Home Delivered Meals do not receive a high percentage of allocated funds, PLHIV have made it clear that going to a food bank brings a sense of security. Additionally, establishing a routine visit to the food bank enhances their wellbeing. In one of the listening sessions a participant stated, "I find the connection with the staff to be as important as getting my food." and another said, "It feels good to get out of the house and do something that is good for my overall health. I get exercise, food and some time to be social." THE LIVED HIV EXPERIENCE The Planning Council gathers input from People Living with HIV (PLHIV) across the Denver Transitional Grant Area (TGA) through multiple avenues. Their lived experience shapes the provision of services and ensures that decisions reflect real community needs. The following is what the Planning Council considers for prioritization. 1. Listening Sessions Organized by the Community Engagement Committee (CEC), listening sessions provide a platform for PLHIV to share their experiences and priorities. Sessions are held in various locations across Denver, reflecting a broad range of identities and needs. Some are designed for specific populations—such as HIV & Aging (50+), monolingual Spanish-speaking individuals, or groups connected to existing peer support programs. Participants receive a light meal and a gift card as appreciation for their time. Summaries from each session are reviewed by the CEC and shared with the full Planning Council. Interested in getting involved? Contact Planning Council staff to assist with a session or attend a CEC meeting. 2. PLHIV on the Council Federal guidelines require that at least 33% of Planning Council members be unaligned PLHIV—meaning individuals not in employment of, or affiliated with a Ryan White Part A service provider. Currently, PLHIV make up 50% of the Council's membership (both aligned and unaligned), providing direct insight into the needs, barriers, and strengths of the community. Note: Any actual or perceived conflicts of interest must be disclosed when sharing information related to HIV care or services. 3. Input from Providers and Staff at Ryan White Funded Agencies Service providers and frontline staff frequently share emerging issues, successes, and client feedback with Planning Council staff. Note: As stated above, any actual or perceived conflicts of interest must be disclosed when sharing information related to HIV care or services. 4. Open Community Feedback Each general council meeting and all DHRPC committee meetings include dedicated time for public comment, offering an opportunity to share insights and concerns by PLHIV. 5. Denver HIV Resources (DHR) and Grievances Planning Council staff maintains regular communication with DHR regarding their relationship with contracted service agencies to gather data and respond to community grievances. When grievances are submitted they are reviewed by the DHR team, Community Coordinator and Ryan White Part B, then appropriate actions are taken. The Community Coordinator compiles and analyzes trends to share relevant findings with the Planning Council to inform decision-making. 6. Needs Assessments & Strategic Data The Planning Council uses quantitative and qualitative data from needs assessments, surveys, and community forums to inform its decisions. This ensures that recommendations and suggestions are supported by documentation and community-led dialogue. Community feedback when openly discussed in Planning Council meetings is documented, valid and important, and should be sited when shaping policy and funding decisions. NEXT STEP: PLANNING COUNCIL DISCUSSION Discuss, Sort, Propose, Finalize, Vote Each service category is discussed and assigned a rank from 1 (most important) to 24 (least important). Various tools—such as breakout groups, queue sorts, and group discussions—may be used to support thoughtful, community-centered decision-making. To ensure clarity, categories that are not expected to be implemented can be grouped separately after the primary categories are prioritized. However, any decision to group, link, or set aside categories must be voted on by the Planning Council. Important: The final prioritized list of all categories must be formally approved—even if the ranking remains unchanged from the previous year. Once finalized, the Priority Setting outcomes can guide: Targeted data collection efforts Future surveys or listening session focus areas Resource allocation planning This process ensures that community voice and real-time data continue to shape a responsive and effective HIV service system. The Promise of Priority Setting Priority setting isn't just a process; it's a promise. A promise that, no matter the changes in funding or policy, the Denver HIV Resources Planning Council is dedicated to follow mandated responsibilities with the hope that every person living with HIV has access to the services that will help them thrive. Together, we will continue to move forward, prioritizing the well-being of our community.

DHRPC Committees Leadership Committee Leadership Committee (LC) monitors the progress of Planning Council activities to ensure that its work aligns with the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program legislation. LC is made up of the planning council leadership team, committee co-chairs, and any planning council member who would like to serve on the Leadership Committee. Rules and Membership Rules and Membership (RM) is responsible for preliminary revision of the DHRPC Bylaws and monitoring DHRPC participation, including the advisement on actions relating to conflict of interest and voting rights. RM assesses how well the Planning Council reflects the current HIV epidemic in the Denver TGA and makes recruitment recommendations to change the roster. RM supports recruitment, interviews potential council members for DHRPC vacancies, and recommends a slate of candidates to the full Planning Council for Mayoral appointment. Service Needs and Assessment Committee Service Needs Assessment Committee (SNAC) works with the Denver HIV Resources to identify service needs by gathering data and conducting needs assessments. SNAC manages all needs assessment activities which include analyzing data used for developing the Statewide Coordinated Statement of Need (SCSN) and the Integrated Plan. With direct input from people living with HIV (PLWH), SNAC conducts the assessment through both qualitative and quantitative methods. SNAC presents data to the PSRA committee in time for priority setting and resource allocation. Community Engagement Committee Metro Denver HIV Service Coalition (MDHSC) Committee assesses the service delivery system to determine system performance in meeting the needs of people living with HIV. The committee, although not exclusively, drafts directives for consideration by the DHRPC, to improve service delivery and address implementation issues. They also review and provide feedback to DHR on service standards and crafts recommendations to the DHRPC on service categories to meet the needs of people living with HIV for PS/RA. Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Committee Priorities Committee develops and evaluates components of the priority setting and resource allocation process, including the data training meetings, community input process, and Priority Setting and Resource Allocations meeting agendas. The committee will evaluate the process annually and make appropriate adjustments to increase productivity and efficiency. They will collaborate with the EAC to determine the data needed to make informed decisions during the PS/RA process. Event Title Event Time Event Date Change the event description to include your own content. Adjust the settings to customize the style. September 2026 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT

Click here to view the DHRPC Google Calendar. MONTHLY CALENDAR Anchor 1 © 2026 Denver HIV Resources Planning Council

DATA DATA DATA DATA EXPLORATION EXPLORATION EXPLORATION EXPLORATION Every Planning Council decision begins somewhere. Sometimes it starts with a question. Sometimes it begins with a single data point. Like beacons and landmarks on a map, data can confirm that services are working well, identify emerging needs, and point toward new areas worthy of investigation. One discovery often leads to another, creating a pathway toward greater understanding and revealing key information that supports informed, data-driven decision-making. Data Exploration is the journey of following those signals. By examining trends, asking questions, and uncovering new insights, the Planning Council identifies opportunities for meaningful change that supports People Living with HIV, creating a map that guides the path forward. The Data Think Tank is your starting point. Submit questions, request information, seek clarification, and review inquiries submitted by fellow members. The link above will open in a seperate window. What will you discover? Hello Thank you for being a Planning Council member. It is a generous act of service that helps so many in the Denver area. This is your personal member page.

The Denver HIV Resources Planning Council is a mayoral-appointed board for the City and County of Denver under the Department of Public Health and Environment that works collaboratively with DDPHE HIV Resources to prioritize services and allocate funding to providers in the Denver metro area. DENVER METRO HIV RESOURCES PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPORTING THE COORDINATION OF HIGH-QUALITY, CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE HIV SERVICES ACROSS THE DENVER TRANSITIONAL GRANT AREA, INCLUDING ADAMS, ARAPAHOE, BROOMFIELD, DENVER, DOUGLAS, AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES. A MAYORAL APPOINTED BOARD LINKS AND PAGES AGREEMENTS CONTACTS COLORADO HIV STRATEGY COMMITTEES & DOCUMENTS THE COUNCIL DATA HUB VIDEO WORKSHOP GRIEVANCES • FEEDBACK • COMMENTS • CONCERNS DO YOU ACCESS SERVICES AND HAVE CONCERNS OR FEEDBACK? CLICK HERE © 2026 Denver HIV Resources Planning Council