Search Results

The Denver HIV Resources Planning Council guides how Ryan White Part A funds are used for HIV care in Denver. With at least one-third People Living with HIV, the Council reviews data, sets service priorities, and makes funding decisions that shape medical care, support services, and long-term planning. This site offers data, videos, workshops, and ways to join and strengthen HIV care in our community. PAGES & LINKS HOW TO JOIN CALENDAR COLORADO HIV STRATEGY PRIORITY SETTING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS CONTACTS THE COUNCIL DATA HUB COMMITTEES & DOCUMENTS VIDEO WORKSHOP DO YOU ACCESS SERVICES AND HAVE CONCERNS OR FEEDBACK? GRIEVANCES • FEEDBACK • COMMENTS • CONCERNS CLICK HERE The Denver HIV Council seeks new members! GO HERE FOR INFORMATION GO HERE FOR THE FLYER Are you ready to join the Denver HIV Resources Planning Council? The Planning Council seeks people with lived HIV experience. Click here for more information. Ryan White Part A Planning Councils guide how federal HIV care funds are used locally. They include the essential participation from People Living with HIV (PLHIV), review data and community input, set service priorities, decide how funds are distributed, and develop long-term plans for a coordinated system of care. While the grantee manages daily operations, the Council ensures funding decisions remain informed and responsive to community needs. Get to Know Us Ryan White HIV Planning Councils are unique. No other federal health or human services program has a legislatively required planning body that is the decision maker about how funds will be used, has such defined membership composition, and requires such a high level of client participation (at least 33 percent). To learn more about the roles and responsibilities of the Planning Council, please view the PC Primer here . © 2026 Denver HIV Resources Planning Council

Select your member page. Becca Kari Michael Bernadette Kendra Michelle Cinzia Lili Miguel Ed Lucia Paige Erin Mary Russ Jadyn Matthew Tim Thank you for visiting. Please click here to learn more about the Planning Council. Please click here to visit our recruitment page.

Each year, the Denver HIV Resources Planning Council (DHRPC) carefully reviews all Ryan White Part A service categories to determine how funding should be distributed. This annual Resource Allocation process is rooted in data and guided by the lived experiences of People Living with HIV (PLHIV). The Resource Allocation process begins with a review of relevant data to evaluate each service category. The Planning Council applies a consistent set of evaluation components to guide decision-making. These include: Importance of the service to People Living with HIV (PLHIV) Impact on viral suppression and the HIV Care Continuum Utilization and demand for the service Provision availability from other funding sources Cost-effectiveness of delivering the service Additional data requests may be submitted to Planning Council leadership Council staff, or directly through this website. After evaluations, the Council sets funding percentages and prepares a Contingency Allocation Plan in case awards or other federal funding streams shift. Plans may be enacted immediately if changes are known or delayed until data is confirmed. Resource Allocation rules safeguard essential services by redirecting funds when major shifts occur. Because Ryan White is the payor of last resort, funds are used only when no other options are available. Every decision reflects a commitment to fiscal responsibility and health outcomes that matter. PRIORITY SETTING FY25 PRIORITY SETTING RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS SERVICE CATEGORIES What is Priority Setting? Resource Allocation is one of the most critical responsibilities of the Planning Council. It is a deliberate, data-driven process that determines how limited Ryan White Part A funds are distributed across eligible services in the Denver TGA. This isn’t just budgeting—it’s strategic triage. With funding levels vulnerable to shifts and economic constraints, the Planning Council must ensure every dollar maximizes health outcomes and meets the core medical and support service needs of people living with HIV. In this environment, Resource Allocation requires fiscal discipline, thoughtful analysis, and commitment to PLHIV. The process involves reviewing utilization trends, service performance, and cost-effectiveness to develop a funding strategy that is both responsive and resilient—even in the face of uncertainty. The decisions made during our Resource Allocations meeting will have a direct impact on access, care, and the future of HIV services in our region. It’s important to note: Not all service categories will receive funding. Contingency Allocations will be established in case the FY2026 grant award is less than expected. Allocation rules may be established to fund or not fund categories at certain percentages when the grant award less a certain percent. Step 1 : Evaluation of the Part A Service Categories Evaluation components determine where service categories will be grouped and includes: what is the service's importance (to PLHIV), impact (on viral suppression and HIV Care Continuum), utilization and demand , provision availability (of funding source), and cost value obtained through service delivery. Here is a closer look at the components used to evaluate the service categories: 1. The Importance to PLHIV PLHIV-Centered Priority Setting By recognizing PLHIV as active participants—not just recipients—in the planning and implementation of HIV care, the Planning Council strives to strengthen a culturally responsive system at the heart of the Ryan White Part A program. Examples of why this matters: The needs of the individual changes throughout their lifetime. Above all else, a PLHIV experiencing homelessness may prioritize Housing Support Services above or Emergency Financial Assistance over other services which are critical for stabilizing their care and access to services. In the Denver TGA, Psychosocial Support Services have historically ranked high because social connection creates space for shared knowledge, emotional support, and empowerment. 2. Impact Service categories that support medication access, adherence, and clinical engagement are central to improving health outcomes for PLHIV and achieving viral suppression. The Planning Council considers how the delivery of services impacts the HIV Care Continuum when setting priorities. Examples: Access to HIV medication is essential for viral suppression and long-term health. ADAP plays a crucial role in ensuring affordability and continuity of treatment. PLHIV who use substances may face challenges with medication adherence. Access to substance use treatment and harm reduction strategies supports care retention and viral load management. Regular visits with HIV care providers help monitor health, adjust treatment as needed, and reinforce adherence-making Outpatient Ambulatory Health a key pillar in achieving viral suppression. 3. Utilization and Demand of Use The Planning Council considers how a service category is being used in the Denver TGA, and the demand for what it provides. Utilization of services informs how well a category is funded. Service Categories that are underspent may not be utilized as much as those with consistent overspending, indicating high demand. Examples: Oral health has a significant impact on overall health and the ability of PLHIV to thrive and it is consistently overspent and in high demand. Medical Nutrition Therapy can greatly benefit PLHIV—especially those managing other conditions like diabetes or gastrointestinal issues and utilization in the Denver TGA has historically been low. This may be due to a limited number of trained providers, lack of patient awareness, or a perception that nutrition support is less urgent than other clinical needs. Low demand also reflects broader changes in the health trajectory of PLHIV. As medical advancements have improved overall wellness, many will no longer face the same nutritional challenges common in the early days of the epidemic. Despite its lower utilization, MNT remains essential for certain populations and warrants consideration based on targeted demand. It should also be noted that, while MNT is a core medical service, it is currently supported through other funding sources. 4. Provision Availability by Payor Source Ryan White Part A is the payor of last resort—meaning it only covers services when no other funding source is available. Priority Setting takes into account whether a service is already paid for by another payor, such as Medicaid, private insurance, or other public programs. This ensures Ryan White Part A funds are used efficiently and directed toward services that cannot be covered elsewhere. Examples: Initial Intake Appointment: For someone newly diagnosed who does not yet have insurance coverage, Ryan White Part A may fund the initial medical visit to ensure immediate linkage to care. Medical Transportation Services (MTS): If Medicaid or other public transportation benefits are not available or applicable, Ryan White Part A may step in to cover transportation costs for medical appointments. However, if another payor is available, that source must be used first. 5. Cost and Value of the Provided Service When setting priorities, the Planning Council considers whether the cost of providing a service is reasonable and sustainable within the available Ryan White Part A budget. Even if a service is in high demand, it must be weighed against how far the funds can stretch and the overall value it brings to PLHIV in the Denver TGA. Cost-effectiveness is a key factor—services that provide broad, sustained impact for a reasonable cost may be ranked higher than more expensive services that serve fewer people or duplicate efforts already funded elsewhere. Examples: Residential Substance Use Services: While important, these services come with a high per-person cost. In the Denver TGA, funding this category through Ryan White Part A would quickly lead to overspending, limiting available dollars for other high-impact services. Housing Services: The need for housing support is critical, but the scale of investment required often exceeds what Ryan White Part A can reasonably provide. As a result, funding housing at a meaningful level would compromise the program’s ability to maintain essential core medical services. Next Step: Council Discussion Discuss, Propose, Finalize, Vote Following a thorough evaluation, the Planning Council determines funding percentages for each service category. These decisions are grounded in data trends and priorities identified through the Priority Setting process. The goal is to ensure resources are directed where they will have the greatest impact. Given the unpredictability of annual grant awards, the Council also prepares a contingency allocation plan—starting with an 80% funding scenario and adaptable down to 60% if necessary. Additional contingencies may be developed, and the Council stands ready to make timely reallocations if funding conditions shift mid-year. This proactive approach protects service continuity and reinforces the DHRPC’s responsibility as stewards of public health funding. The Promise of Resource Allocation Resource Allocation is a council responsibility that is taken very seriously. It is more than assigning funds—it’s a pledge to use every dollar with purpose and accountability. With limited resources and great needs, the process ensures care is guided by evidence and foresight, protecting access, strengthening outcomes, and honoring the trust placed in us. DHRPC Workshop Videos For more visit the DHRPC Video Workshop

Agreements & Attestations Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest At the start of each Planning Council meeting, members share any conflicts of interest to support transparency and fair decision-making. This is usually the only time agencies are named, along with the Ryan White Part A service categories they are funded to provide. Denver Transitional Grant Area (TGA) Ryan White Part A Funded Service Categories Denver Health and Hospital Authority includes The Center for Positive Health Red Clinic Case Management Continuum Early Intervention Services Mental Health Services Medical Transportation Services Outpatient Ambulatory Health Services Oral Health Care Substance Use Services – Outpatient Planning Council members are required to comply with the rules and defined roles outlined in the annual Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Agreements. These agreements are completed online through two attestations and must be renewed annually. Staff may require additional attestations following trainings or complex meetings to reinforce expectations. Confidentiality Attestation Conflict of Interest Attestation Committee Designation All Planning Council members are required to designate and participate in a committee. Attendance at both your designated committee and General Planning Council meetings counts toward your overall attendance. Designated Committee Community Engagement Committee (CEC) If you would like to change your committee assignment, please notify staff. Membership Role Each seat on the Planning Council serves a defined purpose. While members bring a range of perspectives and expertise, these mandated seats ensures key voices are consistently included in decision-making. You have indicated in past agreements that you are comfortable disclosing some personal health information. You may continue to do so my stating the council role listed below. If you would prefer not to disclose information please let PC staff know. Please remember that PC members may chose to disclose sensitive information on their own behalf, and never for someone else. Membership Role Unaligned Person Living with HIV Event Title Event Time Event Date Change the event description to include your own content. Adjust the settings to customize the style. April 2026 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT Hello Thank you for being a Planning Council member. It is a generous act of service that helps so many in the Denver area. This is your personal member page.

The Denver HIV Resources Planning Council is a mayoral-appointed board for the City and County of Denver under the Department of Public Health and Environment that works collaboratively with DDPHE HIV Resources to prioritize services and allocate funding to providers in the Denver metro area. DENVER METRO HIV RESOURCES PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPORTING THE COORDINATION OF HIGH-QUALITY, CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE HIV SERVICES ACROSS THE DENVER TRANSITIONAL GRANT AREA, INCLUDING ADAMS, ARAPAHOE, BROOMFIELD, DENVER, DOUGLAS, AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES. A MAYORAL APPOINTED BOARD LINKS AND PAGES AGREEMENTS CONTACTS COLORADO HIV STRATEGY COMMITTEES & DOCUMENTS THE COUNCIL DATA HUB VIDEO WORKSHOP GRIEVANCES • FEEDBACK • COMMENTS • CONCERNS DO YOU ACCESS SERVICES AND HAVE CONCERNS OR FEEDBACK? CLICK HERE © 2026 Denver HIV Resources Planning Council

Hello Thank you for being a Planning Council member. It is a generous act of service that helps so many in the Denver area. This is your personal member page. Hello Thank you for being a Planning Council member. It is a generous act of service that helps so many in the Denver area. This is your personal member page.

HIV Services and Resources Access Resources from Ryan White Part A Funded Providers in the Denver Metro Area Denver HIV Resources Provider Map Join the DHRPC How to Join the Council Calendar Data and Training New Page New Page Member_Terms Membership-Role Member_Terms Agreements-COI Committtee Designation SSC PC_Member_Header_Eart earth-header earth-header New Page Meetings and Documents DHRPC Survey - PSRA Video Workshop Recipes Team Search Results My Subscriptions More

LANDING PAGE How to Join the Council Meetings and Documents Calendar Data and Training More GROUP AGREEMENTS All attendees are asked to honor a participation process that values individual experience and expertise, and fosters a respectful and safe meeting environment. It is the responsibly of all members of the Planning Council to support the integrity of these key agreements. PREPARATION AND STUDY Planning Council members are expected to review meeting materials and other relevant information in advance. Independent study is encouraged, and members may receive support from Planning Council mentors (“Council Buddies”). Any member may request assistance from Planning Council staff to organize study group sessions. Staff are also available for one-on-one support meetings and to help create ad hoc study groups as needed. DISCLOSURE The decision-making process is built on the understanding that, during meetings, individuals may choose to share personal information. Any information shared should be relevant to the agenda item or motion being discussed. Please note that it is not appropriate to share identifiable information about another person during council discussions. Throughout the year, meeting participants are required to attest to a Confidentiality and Responsibility Agreement, confirming their understanding and commitment to this principle. CONFLICT OF INTEREST To honor the expertise and perspectives of all participants while supporting objective outcomes, all members are required to disclose any service categories they are involved in that receive funding through the Ryan White Program. During important discussions, members may also declare if a perceived bias exists related to specific service categories. Each year, all members must read and attest to the Conflict of Interest (COI) Agreement . THE DHRPC DATA RESOURCE HUB The Planning Council Data Resource Hub compiles data sources and reference tools that guide and inform key decisions. An overview of the information available on the Hub, the Rules and Membership Development Committee (RMDC) has created a video walkthrough. Additional training videos on Ryan White Part A service categories and more can be found at the DHRPC Video Workshop page . Members seeking additional information are encouraged to reach out to the Planning Council Chairs or Staff, a Council mentor (“Council Buddy”), or the Denver HIV Resources team. © 2026 Denver HIV Resources Planning Council

FY2026 Priority Setting and Resource Allocations (PSRA) The Planning Council is tasked with prioritizing and allocating funds to all Service Categories under the Ryan White program for Part A and the Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI). After careful deliberation, the council makes decisions on the importance and ranking of Service Categories based on available data and feedback from People Living with HIV. Go here to view the 2026 PSRA Certificate Go here to view previous PSRA Certificates Below are the PSRA results for Part A and MAI for FY2026. Thank you to everyone who participated and supported the process!

PRIORITY SETTING This approach honors the legacy of The Denver Principles , which call for the meaningful involvement of PLHIV in every aspect of their care and advocacy. By prioritizing services with community input, we uphold the right of PLHIV to be not just recipients of care—but leaders in shaping it. The Denver Principles Through the process of Priority Setting, the Planning Council identifies which services are most vital to improving the lives of People Living with HIV (PLHIV). While the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program funds services that support better health outcomes, Priority Setting ensures that decisions are not made in a vacuum—but with the lived experiences of PLHIV at the forefront. The Planning Council values the lived experiences of People Living with HIV as it transforms the traditional role of “patient” into “participant”. This places the voices of those most impacted by HIV at the center of the decision-making process. When PLHIV are heard, priorities evolve to reflect real needs including those that may be unique or less commonly shared. This process also promotes a value-based, participant-led model to ensure that the Ryan White system stays relevant and grounded in real-life experience. The ultimate goal of Priority Setting is to ensure that each decision the Planning Council makes goes beyond numbers —centering the lives, voices, and well-being of people living with HIV. PRIORITY SETTING FY25 PRIORITY SETTING RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS SERVICE CATEGORIES Helpful background information... RYAN WHITE PART A - SERVICE CATEGORIES Review: Core and Support Service Categories A service category is a provision that is designed to serve specific needs for people living with HIV (PLHIV). Ryan White Part A- Service Categories are divided into two types: The Core Medical Service Categories Core Medical Services relate directly to the provision of HIV care and treatment Core Medical Service Categories: - AIDS Pharmaceutical Assistance (ADAP/ SDAP) - Early Intervention Services - Health Insurance Premium/ Cost Sharing Assistance - Home and Community-Based Health Services - Home Health Care - Hospice - Medical Case Management, including Treatment Adherence Services - Medical Nutrition Therapy - Mental Health Services - Oral Health Care - Outpatient/Ambulatory Health Services - Substance Abuse Outpatient Care Note: At least 75% of funded categories should be core service categories. If support services used exceed 25% of funding Denver HIV Resources (DHR) must apply for a waiver. The Support Service Categories Support Services help PLHIV to stay in care and support better medical outcomes Support Service Categories: - Child Care Services - Emergency Financial Assistance - Food Bank/Home Delivered Meals - Health Education/Risk Reduction - Housing - Legal Services - Linguistic Services - Medical Transportation - Non-Medical Case Management Services - Other Professional Services - Outreach Services - Permanency Planning - Psychosocial Support Services - Referral for Health Care and Support Services - Rehabilitation Services - Respite Care - Substance Abuse Services (residential) More information on service categories, including definitions and the allowable use of funds can be found in Policy Clarification Notice (PCN) #16-02 CLICK HERE FOR THE FY2025 PRIORTY SETTING FOR PART A PRIORITY SETTING FY25 PRIORITY SETTING RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS SERVICE CATEGORIES What is Priority Setting? Priority Setting is the process of ranking Ryan White Part A service categories from highest to lowest priority based on the needs of PLHIV in the Denver Transitional Grant Area (TGA). This ranking helps determine which services are most needed and only those that are prioritized can receive a funding allocation. This process is especially important when funding shifts occur (known as reallocations) or when unforeseen circumstances require contingency funding. For example, if changes in federal funding impact Medicaid, the Planning Council may need to adjust allocations to address the resulting service gaps. Priority Setting is conducted annually. All 24 Ryan White Part A service categories are reviewed and the Planning Council is responsible for ranking them in order of importance. It’s important to note: Not all service categories will receive funding. The ranking order reflects need and not cost because some services may be more expensive to implement than others and may be covered by other funding sources. Core Medical and Support Services can be ranked at any level depending on Planning Council consensus. To be most effective, Priority Setting should be completed well in advance of the Resource Allocation process. Early completion ensures that Planning Council members are familiar with priority areas, allows time for targeted data requests and listening sessions, and provides timely guidance to the office of Denver HIV Resources (DHR). THE HEART BEAT OF LIVED HIV EXPERIENCE Elevating What PLHIV Say Matters Most By recognizing PLHIV as active participants—not just recipients—in the planning and implementation of HIV care, the Planning Council strives to strengthen a culturally responsive system at the heart of the Ryan White Part A program. Why this matters... EXAMPLE 1 The needs of the individual changes throughout their lifetime. Above all, PLHIV experiencing homelessness may prioritize Housing Support Services and Emergency Financial Assistance as services that are critical for stabilizing their daily life, over other service categories. EXAMPLE 2 In the Denver TGA, Psychosocial Support Services have historically ranked high because social connection creates space for shared knowledge, emotional support and empowerment. This has been reiterated at all listening sessions by PLHIV. People find security, comfort and helpful tips from their peers. EXAMPLE 3 While Food Bank/Home Delivered Meals do not receive a high percentage of allocated funds, PLHIV have made it clear that going to a food bank brings a sense of security. Additionally, establishing a routine visit to the food bank enhances their wellbeing. In one of the listening sessions a participant stated, "I find the connection with the staff to be as important as getting my food." and another said, "It feels good to get out of the house and do something that is good for my overall health. I get exercise, food and some time to be social." THE LIVED HIV EXPERIENCE The Planning Council gathers input from People Living with HIV (PLHIV) across the Denver Transitional Grant Area (TGA) through multiple avenues. Their lived experience shapes the provision of services and ensures that decisions reflect real community needs. The following is what the Planning Council considers for prioritization. 1. Listening Sessions Organized by the Community Engagement Committee (CEC), listening sessions provide a platform for PLHIV to share their experiences and priorities. Sessions are held in various locations across Denver, reflecting a broad range of identities and needs. Some are designed for specific populations—such as HIV & Aging (50+), monolingual Spanish-speaking individuals, or groups connected to existing peer support programs. Participants receive a light meal and a gift card as appreciation for their time. Summaries from each session are reviewed by the CEC and shared with the full Planning Council. Interested in getting involved? Contact Planning Council staff to assist with a session or attend a CEC meeting. 2. PLHIV on the Council Federal guidelines require that at least 33% of Planning Council members be unaligned PLHIV—meaning individuals not in employment of, or affiliated with a Ryan White Part A service provider. Currently, PLHIV make up 50% of the Council's membership (both aligned and unaligned), providing direct insight into the needs, barriers, and strengths of the community. Note: Any actual or perceived conflicts of interest must be disclosed when sharing information related to HIV care or services. 3. Input from Providers and Staff at Ryan White Funded Agencies Service providers and frontline staff frequently share emerging issues, successes, and client feedback with Planning Council staff. Note: As stated above, any actual or perceived conflicts of interest must be disclosed when sharing information related to HIV care or services. 4. Open Community Feedback Each general council meeting and all DHRPC committee meetings include dedicated time for public comment, offering an opportunity to share insights and concerns by PLHIV. 5. Denver HIV Resources (DHR) and Grievances Planning Council staff maintains regular communication with DHR regarding their relationship with contracted service agencies to gather data and respond to community grievances. When grievances are submitted they are reviewed by the DHR team, Community Coordinator and Ryan White Part B, then appropriate actions are taken. The Community Coordinator compiles and analyzes trends to share relevant findings with the Planning Council to inform decision-making. 6. Needs Assessments & Strategic Data The Planning Council uses quantitative and qualitative data from needs assessments, surveys, and community forums to inform its decisions. This ensures that recommendations and suggestions are supported by documentation and community-led dialogue. Community feedback when openly discussed in Planning Council meetings is documented, valid and important, and should be sited when shaping policy and funding decisions. NEXT STEP: PLANNING COUNCIL DISCUSSION Discuss, Sort, Propose, Finalize, Vote Each service category is discussed and assigned a rank from 1 (most important) to 24 (least important). Various tools—such as breakout groups, queue sorts, and group discussions—may be used to support thoughtful, community-centered decision-making. To ensure clarity, categories that are not expected to be implemented can be grouped separately after the primary categories are prioritized. However, any decision to group, link, or set aside categories must be voted on by the Planning Council. Important: The final prioritized list of all categories must be formally approved—even if the ranking remains unchanged from the previous year. Once finalized, the Priority Setting outcomes can guide: Targeted data collection efforts Future surveys or listening session focus areas Resource allocation planning This process ensures that community voice and real-time data continue to shape a responsive and effective HIV service system. The Promise of Priority Setting Priority setting isn't just a process; it's a promise. A promise that, no matter the changes in funding or policy, the Denver HIV Resources Planning Council is dedicated to follow mandated responsibilities with the hope that every person living with HIV has access to the services that will help them thrive. Together, we will continue to move forward, prioritizing the well-being of our community.

Todos merecen ser tratados con dignidad y satisfacer sus necesidades. Háganos saber en qué nos quedamos cortos para mejorar el sistema. Si presenta una queja, la información que proporcione ayudará a mejorar los servicios para las personas que viven con VIH en el área de Denver y no afectará negativamente los servicios que recibe. Valoramos todos sus comentarios y las quejas se toman en serio. Su voz importa mientras continuamos trabajando para mejorar los servicios para las personas que viven con VIH. Gracias. CONTINUAR SALIDA

Participation Agreements All council and community members who actively attend meetings conducted by the Denver HIV Resources Planning Council (DHRPC) must review and attest to 2 essential agreements. This is done at least every year, and sometimes more frequently depending the work being done. Here is how to give your attestation. Step 1: Read each of the agreement documents. If you like you may print them or ask for copies be provided to you by Planning Council staff. These documents are always available on the DHRPC website. Step 2: You will be navigated to a form to attest to these agreements. Please make sure you give yourself time to review these agreements. 01 Project Name This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start. It is essential that the Planning Council celebrates having a wide array of individuals. These difference perspectives provide a balanced perspective and gives everyone the opportunity to engage robust conversations and key decisions. It's these differences that make the Ryan White HIV Part A Program unique. These agreements support how folx participate in meetings and help remove bias in the counil'w planning proces. 02 Project Name This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start. 03 Project Name This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start. 04 Project Name This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start.